Re: [PATCH] x86 - 32-bit ptrace emulation mishandles 6th arg

On Wed, Nov 07, 2007 at 01:12:22PM -0800, Roland McGrath wrote:
> Sure has my ACK.  
> I never really understood why my old patch was not taken 2.5 years ago.

Nor I.  It's needed.

As is your PTRACE_SET_THREAD_INFO patch from yesterday - with these
two fixes, I can boot a 32-bit UML on a 64-bit host.

				Jeff

-- 
Work email - jdike at linux dot intel dot com
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH] x86 - 32-bit ptrace emulation mishandles 6th arg
    • From: Roland McGrath <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH] x86 - 32-bit ptrace emulation mishandles 6th arg
    • From: Jeff Dike <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] x86 - 32-bit ptrace emulation mishandles 6th arg
    • From: Roland McGrath <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Suppress A.OUT library support in ELF binfmt if !CONFIG_BINFMT_AOUT [try #3]
• Next by Date: Re: 2.6.34-rc1 eat my photo SD card :-(
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] x86 - 32-bit ptrace emulation mishandles 6th arg
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] x86 - 32-bit ptrace emulation mishandles 6th arg
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]