Re: [Unionfs] Re: [PATCH] IGET: Stop UnionFS from using iget() and read_inode()

In message <[email protected]>, Paul Albrecht writes:
> On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 15:04 +0000, David Howells wrote:
> > Paul Albrecht <[email protected]> wrote:
> > 
> > > Does your test set include readahead-list? I can't get it to work with a
> > > union mounted filesystem without segfault'ing and kernel oops'ing.
> > 
> > Is that with or without this patch?
> 
> Without ... what's the difference? I asked a specific question about the
> test set that was used to validate unionfs and your fix.  
> 
> Paul Albrecht

Paul,

I'll check out the readahead stuff shortly.  I doubt the iget patch has
anything to do with it.

Cheers,
Erez.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Re: [Unionfs] Re: [PATCH] IGET: Stop UnionFS from using iget() and read_inode()
    • From: Paul Albrecht <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [patch 07/23] SLUB: Add defrag_ratio field and sysfs support.
• Next by Date: Re: 2.6.24-rc2=another train wreck with amanda
• Previous by thread: Re: [Unionfs] Re: [PATCH] IGET: Stop UnionFS from using iget() and read_inode()
• Next by thread: Re: [Unionfs] Re: [PATCH] IGET: Stop UnionFS from using iget() and read_inode()
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]