Re: [Unionfs] Re: [PATCH] IGET: Stop UnionFS from using iget() and read_inode()

On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 15:04 +0000, David Howells wrote:
> Paul Albrecht <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> > Does your test set include readahead-list? I can't get it to work with a
> > union mounted filesystem without segfault'ing and kernel oops'ing.
> 
> Is that with or without this patch?

Without ... what's the difference? I asked a specific question about the
test set that was used to validate unionfs and your fix.  

Paul Albrecht
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [Unionfs] Re: [PATCH] IGET: Stop UnionFS from using iget() and read_inode()
  - From: Erez Zadok <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: [Unionfs] Re: [PATCH] IGET: Stop UnionFS from using iget() and read_inode()
  - From: Paul Albrecht <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] IGET: Stop UnionFS from using iget() and read_inode()
  - From: Erez Zadok <[email protected]>
- Re: [Unionfs] Re: [PATCH] IGET: Stop UnionFS from using iget() and read_inode()
  - From: David Howells <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful parser
Next by Date: 2.6.24-rc1: pata_amd fails to detect 80-pin wire
Previous by thread: Re: [Unionfs] Re: [PATCH] IGET: Stop UnionFS from using iget() and read_inode()
Next by thread: Re: [Unionfs] Re: [PATCH] IGET: Stop UnionFS from using iget() and read_inode()
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]