Alan Cox <[email protected]> wrote:
> The old NO_IRQ define some platforms had was long ago declared obsolete
> and wrong. FRV should therefore not be re-introducing this, especially as
> IRQs are usually unsigned in the kernel. The "no IRQ" case is defined to be
> zero and Linus made this rather clear at the time.
>
> arch/frv shows no dependancy on this but it might show up driver fixes
> needing doing I guess
FRV doesn't use IRQ 0, so using 0 instead is fine.
Acked-by: David Howells <[email protected]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
