The old NO_IRQ define some platforms had was long ago declared obsolete
and wrong. FRV should therefore not be re-introducing this, especially as
IRQs are usually unsigned in the kernel. The "no IRQ" case is defined to be
zero and Linus made this rather clear at the time.
arch/frv shows no dependancy on this but it might show up driver fixes
needing doing I guess
Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
--- include/asm-frv//irq.h~ 2007-11-07 16:35:09.927759328 +0000
+++ include/asm-frv/irq.h 2007-11-07 16:35:09.944756744 +0000
@@ -12,9 +12,6 @@
#ifndef _ASM_IRQ_H_
#define _ASM_IRQ_H_
-/* this number is used when no interrupt has been assigned */
-#define NO_IRQ (-1)
-
#define NR_IRQS 48
#define IRQ_BASE_CPU (0 * 16)
#define IRQ_BASE_FPGA (1 * 16)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
