Re: [PATCH 1/2] NET: Re-add VLAN tag for devices incapable of keeping it

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
Patrick McHardy <[email protected]> writes:

I think there is one more case that matters, which is briding
from a device with VLAN stripping for a VLAN not configured
locally. The tag will be stripped and will be lost for forwarded
packets.

I think we should drop such packets on RX. Anyway we shouldn't
forward them.

I believe you misunderstand the configuration I was thinking about:

eth0.1000        br0
    |             |
eth0 with VLAN stripping

Its slightly different that I thought though, __vlan_hwaccel_rx
drops packets for unknown vids, so as soon as you configure a VLAN
locally on the same device that is used for a bridge, no VLAN
packets will be forwarded at all.

Slightly inconsistent with how other layered devices work, but
can be avoided by adding the VLAN to br0.

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux