On Tue, Nov 06, 2007 at 06:56:43AM +0900, Tetsuo Handa wrote:
>
> Linus Torvalds wrote:
> > I personally think string parsers are *much* better than the alternatives
> > (which basically boil down to nasty binary interfaces)
> Me too.
>
> > Binary structures and ioctl's are *much* worse. They are totally
> > undebuggable with generic tools (think "echo" or "strace"), and they are a
> > total nightmare to parse across architectures and pointer sizes.
> Not only pointer sizes bugs, but also checking pointer address costs.
> For binary policy, we have to examine ->next pointer is valid or not.
> We can't blindly use address supplied from userland.
>
> I have encountered mismatch of kernel version and AppArmor's policy parser version
> when I just updated only kernel. As a result, the segmentation faults rushed toward me.
> From this experience, TOMOYO still uses string parser in the kernel.
> If a parser doesn't consume much stack (i.e. call functions recursively), I think it is no problem.
You have a "\?" pattern which is defined as "1 byte character other
than '/'".
The user usually doesn't know how many bytes a character in a path or
file name on his system has.
IMHO not ideal for name-based MAC...
> Thanks.
cu
Adrian
--
"Is there not promise of rain?" Ling Tan asked suddenly out
of the darkness. There had been need of rain for many days.
"Only a promise," Lao Er said.
Pearl S. Buck - Dragon Seed
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
