Re: [PATCH] Smackv10: Smack rules grammar + their stateful parser

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi!

> > Still to come:
> > 
> >   - Final cleanup of smack_load_write and smack_cipso_write.
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> After agreeing with Casey on the "load" input grammar yesterday, here's
> the final grammar and its parser (which needs more testing):
> 
> A Smack Rule in an "egrep" format is:
> 
> "^[:space:]*Subject[:space:]+Object[:space:]+[rwxaRWXA-]+[:space:]*\n"
> 
> where Subject/Object strings are in the form:
> 
> "^[^/[:space:][:cntrl:]]{1,SMK_MAXLEN}$"

Can we avoid string parsers in the kernel?


> +static inline int isblank(char c)
> +{
> +	return (c == ' ' || c == '\t');
> +}

This sounds like enough for 'NAK'.

						Pavel,
		who still thinks smack rules should be parsed
		in userspace and compiled into selinux rules...
		
-- 
(english) http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek
(cesky, pictures) http://atrey.karlin.mff.cuni.cz/~pavel/picture/horses/blog.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux