Krzysztof Halasa wrote: > I guess Stefan could now try to write these values (except GUID > and probably PCI subsystem IDs, and with OHCI 1.1 bit) to the "bad" > card :-) I will get back to this in about two weeks. -- Stefan Richter -=====-=-=== =-== ---=- http://arcgraph.de/sr/ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: VIA VT6307 OHCI version?
- From: Stefan Richter <[email protected]>
- Re: VIA VT6307 OHCI version?
- From: Krzysztof Halasa <[email protected]>
- Re: VIA VT6307 OHCI version?
- From: Stefan Richter <[email protected]>
- Re: VIA VT6307 OHCI version?
- From: Krzysztof Halasa <[email protected]>
- Re: VIA VT6307 OHCI version?
- From: Stefan Richter <[email protected]>
- Re: VIA VT6307 OHCI version?
- From: Krzysztof Halasa <[email protected]>
- Re: VIA VT6307 OHCI version?
- From: Stefan Richter <[email protected]>
- Re: VIA VT6307 OHCI version?
- From: Krzysztof Halasa <[email protected]>
- Re: VIA VT6307 OHCI version?
- From: Stefan Richter <[email protected]>
- Re: VIA VT6307 OHCI version?
- From: Krzysztof Halasa <[email protected]>
- Re: VIA VT6307 OHCI version?
- From: Andreas Mohr <[email protected]>
- Re: VIA VT6307 OHCI version?
- From: Krzysztof Halasa <[email protected]>
- Re: VIA VT6307 OHCI version?
- Prev by Date: Re: [2.6 patch] move edac.txt DOCUMENTATION two levels up
- Next by Date: Re: oops in enqueue_entity with 2.6.24-rc1-g54866f03
- Previous by thread: Re: VIA VT6307 OHCI version?
- Next by thread: 2.6.23 hang, unstable clocksource?
- Index(es):
 |