Re: TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT issues

fwiw i also brought the TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT problems up the end of last year:

http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg28916.html

it's possible the final message in that thread is how we should define the 
behaviour, i haven't tried the TCP_SYNCNT idea though.

-dean
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

References:
- TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT issues
  - From: Felix von Leitner <[email protected]>
- Re: TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT issues
  - From: Eric Dumazet <[email protected]>
- Re: TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT issues
  - From: Felix von Leitner <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: textsearch in module = BUG: scheduling while atomic
Next by Date: Re: Policy on dual licensing?
Previous by thread: Re: TCP_DEFER_ACCEPT issues
Next by thread: [PATCH] md: Fix misapplied patch in raid5.c
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]