On Fri, 2 Nov 2007, Dave Hansen wrote: > > There are certainly more of these, but here is one In the futex > userspace address, we install the current pid's vnr into a userspace > address. Now, realistically, why not just say "you can't use these things across namespaces"? Does anybody really care? After all, somebody who screws this up only screws himself, not anybody else. Linus - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] PID namespace design bug, workaround
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] PID namespace design bug, workaround
- From: Nicholas Miell <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] PID namespace design bug, workaround
- References:
- [patch] PID namespace design bug, workaround
- From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] PID namespace design bug, workaround
- From: Pavel Emelyanov <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] PID namespace design bug, workaround
- From: Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] PID namespace design bug, workaround
- From: Pavel Emelyanov <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] PID namespace design bug, workaround
- From: Ulrich Drepper <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] PID namespace design bug, workaround
- From: Pavel Emelyanov <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] PID namespace design bug, workaround
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] PID namespace design bug, workaround
- From: Dave Hansen <[email protected]>
- [patch] PID namespace design bug, workaround
- Prev by Date: [patch 1/9] genirq: cleanup mismerge artifact
- Next by Date: Re: writeout stalls in current -git
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch] PID namespace design bug, workaround
- Next by thread: Re: [patch] PID namespace design bug, workaround
- Index(es):
 |