Re: [patch] PID namespace design bug, workaround

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 02 Nov 2007 10:55:02 +0300 Pavel Emelyanov <[email protected]> wrote:

> Ulrich Drepper wrote:
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> > 
> > Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
> >> The "fix" I mention is just returning -EINVAL in case user orders 
> >> CLONE_NEWPIDS
> > 
> > That is the "fix" you were referring to?  I was hoping you have a sketch
> > for a real solution.  If nobody can think of a way to fix this PID
> 
> Looks like we misunderstood each other. Can you please elaborate on 
> what exactly is broken in pid namespaces?

Isn't it this?

http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/11/1/141

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux