On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 15:59 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 15:32 +0100, Kay Sievers wrote: > > On Fri, 2007-11-02 at 15:17 +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > Here is the 'pretty' patch :-) > > Since it relies on the removal of the device name length limit, this > should not yet be applied. Ok, I'll take a look now, and see what's needed here. Would be good to get that into the next kernel, now that you are waiting for the crap to get fixed. :) Thanks, Kay - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- Re: per BDI dirty limit (was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.24)
- From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
- Re: per BDI dirty limit (was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.24)
- From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
- Re: per BDI dirty limit (was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.24)
- From: Kay Sievers <[email protected]>
- Re: per BDI dirty limit (was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.24)
- From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
- Re: per BDI dirty limit (was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.24)
- From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
- Re: per BDI dirty limit (was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.24)
- From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
- Re: per BDI dirty limit (was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.24)
- From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
- Re: per BDI dirty limit (was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.24)
- From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
- Re: per BDI dirty limit (was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.24)
- From: Kay Sievers <[email protected]>
- Re: per BDI dirty limit (was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.24)
- From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
- Re: per BDI dirty limit (was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.24)
- From: "Kay Sievers" <[email protected]>
- Re: per BDI dirty limit (was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.24)
- From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
- Re: per BDI dirty limit (was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.24)
- From: Kay Sievers <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] mm: sysfs: expose the BDI object in sysfs
- From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
- Re: per BDI dirty limit (was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.24)
- Prev by Date: Re: [RFC][PATCH] Fix hang in posix_locks_deadlock()
- Next by Date: Re: [Linux-am33-list] [PATCH 0/2] MN10300: Add the MN10300 architecture to Linux kernel [try #2]
- Previous by thread: [PATCH] mm: sysfs: expose the BDI object in sysfs
- Next by thread: Re: per BDI dirty limit (was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.24)
- Index(es):