Re: per BDI dirty limit (was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.24)

One more question,

I currently prefix the names with "bdi-", is that needed?

That is, if I give the bdi object a parent, how will it look?
Would a bdi device with name "sda" with a block device called "sda" as
parent look like: /sys/block/sda/sda? Or would if be
called /sys/block/sda/bdi:sda or just /sys/block/sda/bdi?



-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: per BDI dirty limit (was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.24)
    • From: Kay Sievers <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: per BDI dirty limit (was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.24)
    • From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
  • Re: per BDI dirty limit (was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.24)
    • From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
  • Re: per BDI dirty limit (was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.24)
    • From: Kay Sievers <[email protected]>
  • Re: per BDI dirty limit (was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.24)
    • From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
  • Re: per BDI dirty limit (was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.24)
    • From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
  • Re: per BDI dirty limit (was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.24)
    • From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
  • Re: per BDI dirty limit (was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.24)
    • From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
  • Re: per BDI dirty limit (was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.24)
    • From: Greg KH <[email protected]>
  • Re: per BDI dirty limit (was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.24)
    • From: Kay Sievers <[email protected]>
  • Re: per BDI dirty limit (was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.24)
    • From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>
  • Re: per BDI dirty limit (was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.24)
    • From: "Kay Sievers" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [patch] PID namespace design bug, workaround
• Next by Date: [PATCH] Fix delay accounting regression
• Previous by thread: Re: per BDI dirty limit (was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.24)
• Next by thread: Re: per BDI dirty limit (was Re: -mm merge plans for 2.6.24)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]