RE: [PATCH 0/2 -v2 resend] x86_64 EFI boot support

>From: H. Peter Anvin [mailto:[email protected]]
>The "EFI boot" patchset looks fairly unobtrusive to me.  One objection:
>the VIDEO_TYPE_ numbers appear split up into groups; and the EFI one
>probably should be 0x70 instead of 0x24.

Should I change this and resend the patchset? Or you modify it before
merging?

Best Regards,
Huang Ying
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 0/2 -v2 resend] x86_64 EFI boot support
  - From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH 0/2 -v2 resend] x86_64 EFI boot support
  - From: "Huang, Ying" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2 -v2 resend] x86_64 EFI boot support
  - From: "Huang, Ying" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2 -v2 resend] x86_64 EFI boot support
  - From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 0/2 -v2 resend] x86_64 EFI boot support
  - From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [Lguest] [PATCH 3/16] read/write_crX, clts and wbinvd for 64-bit paravirt
Next by Date: Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce per cpu access overhead
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/2 -v2 resend] x86_64 EFI boot support
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/2 -v2 resend] x86_64 EFI boot support
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]