Re: [PATCH 0/2 -v2 resend] x86_64 EFI boot support

Andrew Morton wrote:

I stopped paying attention, sorry.  Have all the outstanding issues been
addressed?

The "EFI boot" patchset looks fairly unobtrusive to me. One objection: the VIDEO_TYPE_ numbers appear split up into groups; and the EFI one probably should be 0x70 instead of 0x24.

Other than that, I just need to verify it doesn't break anything.

"EFI runtime" I have not had time to review yet.

	-hpa

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • RE: [PATCH 0/2 -v2 resend] x86_64 EFI boot support
    • From: "Huang, Ying" <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH 0/2 -v2 resend] x86_64 EFI boot support
    • From: "Huang, Ying" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/2 -v2 resend] x86_64 EFI boot support
    • From: "Huang, Ying" <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 0/2 -v2 resend] x86_64 EFI boot support
    • From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: 2.6.22+, CONFIG_NO_HZ=n, but irq/s looks like NO_HZ=y
• Next by Date: Suspend to ram regression (2.6.24-rc1-git)
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 0/2 -v2 resend] x86_64 EFI boot support
• Next by thread: RE: [PATCH 0/2 -v2 resend] x86_64 EFI boot support
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]