From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]> Date: Thu, 1 Nov 2007 06:03:44 -0700 (PDT) > In order to make it truly dynamic we would have to virtually map the > area. vmap? But that reduces performance. But it would still be faster than the double-indirection we do now, right? - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce per cpu access overhead
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce per cpu access overhead
- References:
- Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce per cpu access overhead
- From: David Miller <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce per cpu access overhead
- From: David Miller <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce per cpu access overhead
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce per cpu access overhead
- Prev by Date: Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce per cpu access overhead
- Next by Date: Re: expected behavior of PF_PACKET on NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX device?
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce per cpu access overhead
- Next by thread: Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce per cpu access overhead
- Index(es):
 |