Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce per cpu access overhead

[David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>]

From: David Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
Date: Thu, 01 Nov 2007 00:01:18 -0700 (PDT)

> From: Christoph Lameter <clameter@sgi.com>
> Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 21:16:59 -0700 (PDT)
> 
> > Index: linux-2.6/mm/allocpercpu.c
> > ===================================================================
> > --- linux-2.6.orig/mm/allocpercpu.c	2007-10-31 20:53:16.565486654 -0700
> > +++ linux-2.6/mm/allocpercpu.c	2007-10-31 21:00:27.553486484 -0700
>  ...
> > @@ -37,7 +42,7 @@ enum unit_type { FREE, END, USED };
> >  
> >  static u8 cpu_alloc_map[UNITS_PER_CPU] = { 1, };
> >  static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(cpu_alloc_map_lock);
> > -static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, cpu_area)[UNITS_PER_CPU];
> > +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned long long, cpu_area)[UNITS_PER_CPU];
> >  
> >  #define CPU_DATA_OFFSET ((unsigned long)&per_cpu__cpu_area)
> >  
> 
> This hunk helped the sparc64 looping OOPS I was getting, but cpus hang
> in some other fashion soon afterwards.

And if I bump PER_CPU_ALLOC_SIZE up to 128K it seems to mostly work.

You'll definitely need to make this work dynamically somehow.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/