Re: [patch] PID namespace design bug, workaround

Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-11-01 at 17:51 +0300, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
> 
>>  So can we, please, 
>> keep things as they are for now - the appropriate fix will be ready 
>> soon.
> 
> Just for the curious, could you outline on how you intend to fix this?

I have already answered to Ulrich about this. Just to
make this sub-thread consistent:

The "fix" I mention is just returning -EINVAL in case user orders 
CLONE_NEWPIDS and compiling out all the namespace cloning code. This 
is just a more elegant way to get rid of pid namespaces rather than 
Ingo proposed.

Here's the root of the set:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/10/31/118

Thanks,
Pavel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch] PID namespace design bug, workaround
  - From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>

References:
- [patch] PID namespace design bug, workaround
  - From: Ingo Molnar <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] PID namespace design bug, workaround
  - From: Pavel Emelyanov <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch] PID namespace design bug, workaround
  - From: Peter Zijlstra <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: [patch] PID namespace design bug, workaround
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/2] Char: tty, add tty_schedule_wakeup
Previous by thread: Re: [patch] PID namespace design bug, workaround
Next by thread: Re: [patch] PID namespace design bug, workaround
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]