Re: [patch] PID namespace design bug, workaround

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, 2007-11-01 at 17:51 +0300, Pavel Emelyanov wrote:
> 
>>  So can we, please, 
>> keep things as they are for now - the appropriate fix will be ready 
>> soon.
> 
> Just for the curious, could you outline on how you intend to fix this?

I have already answered to Ulrich about this. Just to
make this sub-thread consistent:

The "fix" I mention is just returning -EINVAL in case user orders 
CLONE_NEWPIDS and compiling out all the namespace cloning code. This 
is just a more elegant way to get rid of pid namespaces rather than 
Ingo proposed.

Here's the root of the set:
http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/10/31/118

Thanks,
Pavel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux