From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]> Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2007 18:12:11 -0700 (PDT) > On Wed, 31 Oct 2007, David Miller wrote: > > > All I can do now is bisect and then try to figure out what about the > > guilty change might cause the problem. > > Reverting the 7th patch should avoid using the sparc register that caches > the per cpu area offset? (I though so, does it?) Yes, that's right, %g5 holds the local cpu's per-cpu offset. - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce per cpu access overhead
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce per cpu access overhead
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce per cpu access overhead
- References:
- Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce per cpu access overhead
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce per cpu access overhead
- From: David Miller <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce per cpu access overhead
- From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce per cpu access overhead
- Prev by Date: Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce per cpu access overhead
- Next by Date: Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce per cpu access overhead
- Previous by thread: Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce per cpu access overhead
- Next by thread: Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce per cpu access overhead
- Index(es):
 |