Re: expected behavior of PF_PACKET on NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX device?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Stephen Hemminger wrote:

The code in AF_PACKET should fix the skb before passing to user space so that there is no difference between accel and non-accel hardware. Internal choices shouldn't leak to user space. Ditto, the receive checksum offload should be fixed up as well.
Ok, I guess that will fix the sniffing issues and any user-space bridging type applications.

Currently, VLAN devices offer the ability to 'reorder' the header and explicitly remove the VLAN header. I assume we keep this feature and have the AF_PACKET logic check the device
flags to see if it should insert the VLAN header for hw-accel vlans?

Either way, if we sniff the underlying device, we should always get the VLAN header.

What about drivers and filtering VLANs? It seems there is still a difference between software
vlans and hw-accel in this case.

Thanks,
Ben

--
Ben Greear <[email protected]> Candela Technologies Inc http://www.candelatech.com


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux