Re: expected behavior of PF_PACKET on NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX device?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 14:43:51 -0400
Dave Johnson <[email protected]> wrote:

> 
> Depending on the network driver, I'm seeing different behavior if
> a .1q packet is received to an PF_PACKET, SOCK_RAW, ETH_P_ALL socket.
> 
> 
> On devices what do not use NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX, the packet socket gets
> the complete packet with vlan tag included as the driver simply calls
> netif_receive_skb() or equivilant.  packet_rcv() then gets the whole
> thing vlan tag included and sends this through the socket.
> 
> vlan_skb_recv() also gets these all and will drop them because there
> are no vlans configured.
> 

The VLAN acceleration grabs and hides the tag. It is a design flaw
that should be fixed, feel free to post a patch.


-- 
Stephen Hemminger <[email protected]>
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux