Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce per cpu access overhead

On Wed, 31 Oct 2007, David Miller wrote:

> It crashes when SSHD starts, the serial console GETTY hasn't
> started up yet so I can't even log in to run those commands
> Christoph.

Hmmm... Bad.

> All I can do now is bisect and then try to figure out what about the
> guilty change might cause the problem.

Reverting the 7th patch should avoid using the sparc register that caches 
the per cpu area offset? (I though so, does it?)
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce per cpu access overhead
  - From: David Miller <[email protected]>

References:
- Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce per cpu access overhead
  - From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce per cpu access overhead
  - From: David Miller <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce per cpu access overhead
  - From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
- Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce per cpu access overhead
  - From: David Miller <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: expected behavior of PF_PACKET on NETIF_F_HW_VLAN_RX device?
Next by Date: Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce per cpu access overhead
Previous by thread: Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce per cpu access overhead
Next by thread: Re: [patch 0/7] [RFC] SLUB: Improve allocpercpu to reduce per cpu access overhead
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]