On Wed, 31 Oct 2007 11:37:36 +0100,
Stefan Richter <[email protected]> wrote:
> > mask_out() would also imply that the common use case is to have all
> > attributes in the group created and that you need to take action to
> > have an attribute not created.
>
> Here you have a point. But James has a point too when he says:
> | We basically want to show capability by which file is present.
Currently, if you register an attribute group, all of the attributes
will show up. I find it more intuitive to have to block some attributes
explicitely if I want to have more control, but the original logic is
fine with me as well, if most people prefer that :)
> Anyway, /if/ the reverse logic is preferred, it shouldn't be called
> "mask_out()" but rather "is_masked()" or "is_hidden()" or the like.
Sure. is_masked() would be fine.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
