On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 11:42:21AM +0000, Ralf Baechle wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 30, 2007 at 02:37:19AM -0600, Matthew Wilcox wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 29, 2007 at 10:03:16PM -0500, Kumar Gala wrote:
> > > same HW platform that you want to run with just 32-bit phys (for
> > > performance).
> >
> > Have you measured what the performance difference is?
>
> So that's 5668, 256 bytes data and 128 bytes of bss for a total of 6052
> bytes. Not a whole lot but I still fear some users on the most
> claustrophobic systems will mind.
Oh, sure, I'm not saying I thought there would be no size difference; I
was just bemused at the suggestion there was a performance difference.
Unless "won't fit in ROM any more" is considered a performance problem ;-)
--
Intel are signing my paycheques ... these opinions are still mine
"Bill, look, we understand that you're interested in selling us this
operating system, but compare it to ours. We can't possibly take such
a retrograde step."
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
