Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface)

[Toshiharu Harada <haradats@nttdata.co.jp>]

On 10/30/2007 5:40 PM, Jan Engelhardt wrote:
> On Oct 30 2007 12:23, Toshiharu Harada wrote:
> > Instead of pushing TOMOYO Linux, I started developing
> > comparison chart of security-enhance Linux implementations.
> > The current version can be found in
> >
> > http://tomoyo.sourceforge.jp/wiki-e/?WhatIs#comparison
>
> Smack Security Model: autolabel, as far as I can tell.
I noticed the smell of danger in the naming of "Security Model".
Please allow me some time.

> Smack Policy Generation: user - hand - and an editor
> Apparmor tutorial (beats any FAQ at first):
> 	ftp://ftp.belnet.be/pub/mirror/FOSDEM/FOSDEM2006-apparmor.avi
Updated above two items. Thank you. :)

I'm not an optimist to believe we can reach the perfect
comparison. The purpose is to feed information, not to judge.
This might sound ironically, but I don't really think
we can *compare* them because they have different
theories/purposes/backgrounds. Some kind of forgiveness and
fuzziness are required.

As I don't want to steal everybody's bandwidth,
simple updates will be done silently. Your suggestions and
information will be greatly appreciated despite of
visible evidence.

Thank you.
Toshiharu Harada

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/