On Sat, Oct 27, 2007 at 03:40:04PM -0700, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-10-27 at 23:47 +0400, Alexey Dobriyan wrote:
> > Remove proc_fs.h from headers that doesn't really need it.
>
> > --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/process.c
> > @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
> > #include <linux/errno.h>
> > #include <linux/sched.h>
> > #include <linux/kernel.h>
> > +#include <linux/fs.h>
>
> Your code doesn't match your patch description.
>
> You've got new includes of:
>
> <linux/fs.h>
> <linux/proc_fs.h>
> <linux/err.h>
> <linux/kref.h>
>
> and forward declarations of
>
> struct proc_dir_entry;
> struct file_operations;
Removal of header A from header B creates compilation breakages for
files which were getting A indirectly. So you have to complensate in all
such cases.
> As a general rule, I think it better to use includes
> than use naked forward declarations.
Well, we also want faster compilation and less time wasted when
test-compiling patches.
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
