Andy Whitcroft wrote:
On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 01:48:14PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote:Andy, I thought we were going to whine about __inline__ and __inline, too?Hmmm, I don't remember that coming up, but I'll add it to the todo. I am assuming plain 'inline' is preferred over both of these -- yell if you meant something else.
Yes, use __inline__ if and only if it is exported to userspace. -hpa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- References:
- [PATCH] bitops kernel-doc: expand macro
- From: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] bitops kernel-doc: expand macro
- From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
- [PATCH v2] bitops kernel-doc: inline instead of macro
- From: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH v2] bitops kernel-doc: inline instead of macro
- From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH v2] bitops kernel-doc: inline instead of macro
- From: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH v2] bitops kernel-doc: inline instead of macro
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH v2] bitops kernel-doc: inline instead of macro
- From: Andy Whitcroft <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] bitops kernel-doc: expand macro
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 0/2] Version 9 (2.6.24-rc1) Smack: Simplified Mandatory Access Control Kernel
- Next by Date: Re: [PATCH] ide/arm/icside: fallout from commit 86f3a492bb09eee5745b93af35f2212179c251fd
- Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v2] bitops kernel-doc: inline instead of macro
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v2] bitops kernel-doc: inline instead of macro
- Index(es):
 |