On Thu, Oct 25, 2007 at 01:48:14PM -0700, Andrew Morton wrote: > Andy, I thought we were going to whine about __inline__ and __inline, too? Hmmm, I don't remember that coming up, but I'll add it to the todo. I am assuming plain 'inline' is preferred over both of these -- yell if you meant something else. -apw - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH v2] bitops kernel-doc: inline instead of macro
- From: "H. Peter Anvin" <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH v2] bitops kernel-doc: inline instead of macro
- From: Andy Whitcroft <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH v2] bitops kernel-doc: inline instead of macro
- References:
- [PATCH] bitops kernel-doc: expand macro
- From: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] bitops kernel-doc: expand macro
- From: Nick Piggin <[email protected]>
- [PATCH v2] bitops kernel-doc: inline instead of macro
- From: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH v2] bitops kernel-doc: inline instead of macro
- From: Thomas Gleixner <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH v2] bitops kernel-doc: inline instead of macro
- From: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH v2] bitops kernel-doc: inline instead of macro
- From: Andrew Morton <[email protected]>
- [PATCH] bitops kernel-doc: expand macro
- Prev by Date: Re: [0/3] Distributed storage. Mirror algo extension for automatic recovery.
- Next by Date: Re: [BUG] panic after umount (biscted)
- Previous by thread: [PATCH] x86 bitops: fix code style issues
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v2] bitops kernel-doc: inline instead of macro
- Index(es):
 |