Re: Using -traditional in EXTRA_AFLAGS

On Thursday 25 October 2007 16:21, Glauber de Oliveira Costa wrote:
> > > is there any particular reason we're using -traditional in
> > > EXTRA_AFLAGS in Makefiles?
> >
> > What?  Where?  I thought I removed them all.  Or is this from the x86_64
> > tree?
> 
> This is from arch/x86/kernel/Makefile_64

Indeed. I, too, would like it to be removed, even only on the grounds
that whoever added it didn't add a small one-line comment explaining why.
--
vda
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• References:
  • Using -traditional in EXTRA_AFLAGS
    • From: "Glauber de Oliveira Costa" <[email protected]>
  • Re: Using -traditional in EXTRA_AFLAGS
    • From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
  • Re: Using -traditional in EXTRA_AFLAGS
    • From: "Glauber de Oliveira Costa" <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 2/3] RT: Cache cpus_allowed weight for optimizing migration
• Next by Date: Re: [stable] [PATCH] lockdep: fix mismatched lockdep_depth/curr_chain_hash
• Previous by thread: Re: Using -traditional in EXTRA_AFLAGS
• Next by thread: Is gcc thread-unsafe?
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]