> The idea that poor security is worse than no security is fallacious, > and not backed up by common experience. There is a ton of evidence both in computing and outside of it which shows that poor security can be very much worse than no security at all. In particular stuff which makes users think they are secure but is worthless is very dangerous indeed. When you know that security is limited you act appropriately, when you believe security is good but it is not you take inappropriate risks and get badly burned. Alan - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface)
- From: Crispin Cowan <[email protected]>
- Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface)
- From: "Ray Lee" <[email protected]>
- Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface)
- From: [email protected]
- Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface)
- References:
- Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface)
- From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
- Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface)
- From: Casey Schaufler <[email protected]>
- Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface)
- From: Chris Wright <[email protected]>
- Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface)
- From: "Ray Lee" <[email protected]>
- Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface)
- Prev by Date: [PATCH 2.6.24-rc1] fix sg_phys to use dma_addr_t
- Next by Date: Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface)
- Previous by thread: Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface)
- Next by thread: Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface)
- Index(es):