Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface)

On Oct 24 2007 19:11, Simon Arlott wrote:
>
>* (I've got a list of access rules which are scanned in order until one of 
>them matches, and an array of one bit for every port for per-port default 
>allow/deny - although the latter could be removed.
>http://svn.lp0.eu/simon/portac/trunk/)

Besides the 'feature' of inhibiting port binding,
is not this task of blocking connections something for a firewall?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface)
    • From: Crispin Cowan <[email protected]>
  • Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface)
    • From: Simon Arlott <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: LSM conversion to static interface
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
  • Re: LSM conversion to static interface
    • From: Andreas Gruenbacher <[email protected]>
  • Re: LSM conversion to static interface
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
  • Re: LSM conversion to static interface
    • From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
  • Re: LSM conversion to static interface
    • From: James Morris <[email protected]>
  • Re: LSM conversion to static interface [revert patch]
    • From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
  • Re: LSM conversion to static interface [revert patch]
    • From: Chris Wright <[email protected]>
  • Re: LSM conversion to static interface [revert patch]
    • From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
  • Re: LSM conversion to static interface [revert patch]
    • From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
  • Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface
    • From: "Simon Arlott" <[email protected]>
  • Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface
    • From: Adrian Bunk <[email protected]>
  • Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface)
    • From: Simon Arlott <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [2.6 patch] make sunrpc/xprtsock.c:xs_setup_{udp,tcp}() static
• Next by Date: Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface)
• Previous by thread: Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface)
• Next by thread: Re: Linux Security *Module* Framework (Was: LSM conversion to static interface)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]