Re: [PATCH 09/10] Change table chaining layout

[Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>]

On Wed, 24 Oct 2007, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > 
> > As it no longer sets the page only, perhaps it's a good idea to rename
> > sg_set_page() to sg_set()?
> 
> sg_set_buf() also sets length and offset, sg_set_page() is just a mirror
> of that. So I'd prefer to keep the naming.

I agree. And it's not like you can get it wrong, since if you only give 
the "page" argument, the preprocessor will complain loudly.

I think "sg_set_x()" is now rather logical - we fill in the SG entry 
(entirely), and the only question is _how_ we do it (which is what "x" 
says - using a page, or a kernel buffer).

		Linus
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/