Re: [PATCH 09/10] Change table chaining layout

On Wed, Oct 24 2007, Olivier Galibert wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 24, 2007 at 11:12:42AM +0200, Jens Axboe wrote:
> > sg_set_buf() also sets length and offset, sg_set_page() is just a mirror
> > of that. So I'd prefer to keep the naming.
> 
> Hmmm, sg_set_phys/sg_set_virt to be more symmetrical to
> sg_phys/sg_virt?

(please don't drop cc lists)

That doesn't make any sense. Both sg_set_buf() and sg_set_page() set the
same thing in the sg entry, the input is just different. It has nothing
to do with setting the physical value, for instance.

-- 
Jens Axboe

-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 09/10] Change table chaining layout
    • From: Olivier Galibert <[email protected]>

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH 09/10] Change table chaining layout
    • From: Boaz Harrosh <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 09/10] Change table chaining layout
    • From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 09/10] Change table chaining layout
    • From: Boaz Harrosh <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 09/10] Change table chaining layout
    • From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 09/10] Change table chaining layout
    • From: Boaz Harrosh <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 09/10] Change table chaining layout
    • From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 09/10] Change table chaining layout
    • From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 09/10] Change table chaining layout
    • From: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 09/10] Change table chaining layout
    • From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 09/10] Change table chaining layout
    • From: Olivier Galibert <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: kernel processes - are they really needed?
• Next by Date: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/5] Remove CPU_DEAD/CPU_UP_CANCELLED handling from workqueue.c
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 09/10] Change table chaining layout
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 09/10] Change table chaining layout
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]