Re: SLUB 0:1 SLAB (OOM during massive parallel kernel builds)

On Tue, 23 Oct 2007, Pekka Enberg wrote:

> > > cc1 invoked oom-killer: gfp_mask=0x1201d2, order=0, oomkilladj=0
> 
> Christoph Lameter wrote:
> > Regular Order 0 alloc .... but why is there no memory available , reclaimed?
> 
> I am too wondering where all that memory is going. Logging /proc/meminfo and
> slabinfo -S (see Documentation/vm/slabinfo.c) every few minutes or so probably
> might help answering that question

__GFP_HARDWALL and __GFP_MOVABLE is set. I guess we have no cpusets on the 
box? Wonder what the antifrag status is? Can we get /proc/pagetypeinfo?


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: SLUB 0:1 SLAB (OOM during massive parallel kernel builds)
    • From: [email protected] (Mel Gorman)

• References:
  • SLUB 0:1 SLAB (OOM during massive parallel kernel builds)
    • From: Alexey Dobriyan <[email protected]>
  • Re: SLUB 0:1 SLAB (OOM during massive parallel kernel builds)
    • From: Christoph Lameter <[email protected]>
  • Re: SLUB 0:1 SLAB (OOM during massive parallel kernel builds)
    • From: Pekka Enberg <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 09/10] Change table chaining layout
• Next by Date: [RFC PATCH 0/2] use virtual time for CFS on s390
• Previous by thread: Re: SLUB 0:1 SLAB (OOM during massive parallel kernel builds)
• Next by thread: Re: SLUB 0:1 SLAB (OOM during massive parallel kernel builds)
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]