Re: [PATCH 09/10] Change table chaining layout

Jens Axboe <[email protected]> writes:

>> You might want to put a BUG_ON(page & 0x3); Make sure
>> you're not loosing information. (The m68k problem)
>
> That's a really good idea, thanks Boaz! I'll add that.

It would be even better if you replaced all the magic numbers with defines
or better accessors.

-Andi
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH 09/10] Change table chaining layout
    • From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>

• References:
  • [PATCH 00/10] SG updates
    • From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
  • [PATCH 09/10] Change table chaining layout
    • From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 09/10] Change table chaining layout
    • From: Boaz Harrosh <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH 09/10] Change table chaining layout
    • From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: [PATCH] Fujitsu application panel driver
• Next by Date: Re: SLUB 0:1 SLAB (OOM during massive parallel kernel builds)
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 09/10] Change table chaining layout
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 09/10] Change table chaining layout
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]