* Andi Kleen <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 23, 2007 at 04:20:06PM +0200, Ingo Molnar wrote:
> >
> > * Andi Kleen <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > > >> You should rename it then to "asmcall" or something.
> > > >
> > > > if then that should be a separate renaming patch.
> > >
> > > Well you're asking for the ugly hacks for out of tree code. [...]
> >
> > nice word-bending there. I'm asking for pre-existing annotations to
> > survive.
>
> What I'm objecting to is that you ask for this for your out of tree
> code without any justification on why exactly -- -pg should in theory
> work with -mregparms.
last i checked it didnt work - i'll re-check that.
but even taking the latency tracer completely out of the picture,
maintaining this information is useful - at least for some time.
> It's standard policy to require very good reasons for changes that are
> only useful for out of tree code. [...]
it's not just for out of tree code - it's to keep the information of the
calling convention maintained - we could need it in the future.
> Is it just because you didn't want to adapt the tracer for i386
> regparm? [...]
uhm, thank you for such accusations and personal attacks :-( How did i
deserve that?
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
