* Jens Axboe <[email protected]> wrote: > It's all about the end goal - having maintainable and resilient code. > And I think the sg code will be better once we get past the next day > or so, and it'll be more robust. That is what matters to me, not the > simplicity of the patch itself. Linus' latest tree, which has your SG-list enhancements included, certainly works fine here and does not have the problems of the first iteration. Ingo - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH 09/10] Change table chaining layout
- From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 09/10] Change table chaining layout
- References:
- [PATCH 00/10] SG updates
- From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 09/10] Change table chaining layout
- From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 09/10] Change table chaining layout
- From: Geert Uytterhoeven <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 09/10] Change table chaining layout
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 09/10] Change table chaining layout
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 09/10] Change table chaining layout
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 09/10] Change table chaining layout
- From: Alan Cox <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 09/10] Change table chaining layout
- From: Linus Torvalds <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 09/10] Change table chaining layout
- From: Boaz Harrosh <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH 09/10] Change table chaining layout
- From: Jens Axboe <[email protected]>
- [PATCH 00/10] SG updates
- Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 09/10] Change table chaining layout
- Next by Date: Re: sr_mod oops (elv_next_request involved)
- Previous by thread: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] sg_ring instead of scatterlist chaining
- Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 09/10] Change table chaining layout
- Index(es):
 |