Rene Herman wrote:
> On 10/22/2007 02:40 PM, Pekka Enberg wrote:
>
>> NAK. This will cause double-unlock when CONFIG_BUG is disabled. It's
>> incorrect to assume that BUG() will always terminate the current
>> process.
>
> (which by the way also means that the "return;" delete from your
> original patch changes behaviour for !CONFIG_BUG, and probably not for
> the better).
>
> Rene.
Thanks for your comments. A patch containing this suggestion is:
[PATCH retry] return hidden bug and unlock bugs.
Roel
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
