* Andrew Morton <[email protected]> wrote:
> > but what bothers me even more is the large picture. Linux's
> > development is still fundamentally skewed towards bandwidth (which
> > goes up with hardware advances anyway), while the focus on latencies
> > is very lacking (which users do care about much more and which
> > usually does _not_ improve with improved hardware), so i cannot see
> > why we shouldnt apply this. Reminds me of the illogical, almost
> > superstitious resistence against the relatime patch. (which is not
> > in 2.6.24 mind you - killed for good)
>
> Try `mount -o relatime' and prepare to be surprised ;)
i mean this one:
http://people.redhat.com/mingo/relatime-patches/improve-relatime.patch
this actually makes relatime practical.
Ingo
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
