On Mon, 15 Oct 2007 10:46:47 -0700
Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]> wrote:
>
> Subject: Give kjournald a IOPRIO_CLASS_RT io priority
> From: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
>
> With latencytop, I noticed that the (in memory) atime updates during a
> kernel build had latencies of 600 msec or longer; this is obviously not so
> nice behavior. Other EXT3 journal related operations had similar or even
> longer latencies.
>
> Digging into this a bit more, it appears to be an interaction between EXT3
> and CFQ in that CFQ tries to be fair to everyone, including kjournald.
> However, in reality, kjournald is "special" in that it does a lot of journal
> work and effectively this leads to a twisted kind of "mass priority
> inversion" type of behavior.
>
> The good news is that CFQ already has the infrastructure to make certain
> processes special... JBD just wasn't using that quite yet.
>
> The patch below makes kjournald of the IOPRIO_CLASS_RT priority to break
> this priority inversion behavior. With this patch, the latencies for atime
> updates (and similar operation) go down by a factor of 3x to 4x !
>
Seems a pretty fundamental change which could do with some careful
benchmarking, methinks.
See, your patch amounts to "do more seeks to improve one test case".
Surely other testcases will worsen. What are they?
> Signed-off-by: Arjan van de Ven <[email protected]>
>
>
> diff -purN linux-2.6.23-rc9.org/fs/jbd/journal.c linux-2.6.23-rc9.lt/fs/jbd/journal.c
> --- linux-2.6.23-rc9.org/fs/jbd/journal.c 2007-10-02 05:24:52.000000000 +0200
> +++ linux-2.6.23-rc9.lt/fs/jbd/journal.c 2007-10-14 00:06:55.000000000 +0200
> @@ -35,6 +35,7 @@
> #include <linux/kthread.h>
> #include <linux/poison.h>
> #include <linux/proc_fs.h>
> +#include <linux/ioprio.h>
>
> #include <asm/uaccess.h>
> #include <asm/page.h>
> @@ -131,6 +132,8 @@ static int kjournald(void *arg)
> printk(KERN_INFO "kjournald starting. Commit interval %ld seconds\n",
> journal->j_commit_interval / HZ);
>
> + current->ioprio = (IOPRIO_CLASS_RT << IOPRIO_CLASS_SHIFT) | 4;
> +
Might be worth a code comment?
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
