On Sun, 21 Oct 2007 23:03:13 +0200 Sam Ravnborg wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 21, 2007 at 09:45:17AM -0700, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > > Is there any other way to specify that a functionality can only be built
> > > as a module, not built into the kernel?
> >
> > config FOO
> > depends on BAR && m
> >
> > restricts FOO to module-only.
> >
> > > In my firsta attempts to post about these tests my post ended up not on
> > > the mailing list but as a reply to Sam Ravnborg only, apologies for
> > > that...
>
> This is obviously the right solution.
> Randy - we should document this somewhere together with more kconfig tips'n'tricks.
Agreed.
> A new document or do we extend kconfig-language?
I don't see a need for a separate document. I would just extend
kconfig-language.
---
~Randy
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
