Re: tristate and bool not enogh for Kconfig anymore

On Sat, Oct 20, 2007 at 02:42:38PM +0200, Henrik Carlqvist wrote:
> I think there is a need for Kconfig to specify that a functionality could
> be built as a module or not built at all.

I assume
	depends on MODULES

should do the trick.

	Sam
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: tristate and bool not enogh for Kconfig anymore
  - From: [email protected]
- Re: tristate and bool not enogh for Kconfig anymore
  - From: Randy Dunlap <[email protected]>

References:
- [PATCH] Kconfig bug
  - From: Nick Warne <[email protected]>
- tristate and bool not enogh for Kconfig anymore
  - From: Henrik Carlqvist <[email protected]>

Prev by Date: Re: git/cscope with x86 merge
Next by Date: Re: nfsv2 ref leak in 2.6.24?
Previous by thread: tristate and bool not enogh for Kconfig anymore
Next by thread: Re: tristate and bool not enogh for Kconfig anymore
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]