Re: [PATCH] rd: Mark ramdisk buffers heads dirty

Am Donnerstag, 18. Oktober 2007 schrieb Eric W. Biederman:
> Grr. Inconsistent rules on a core piece of infrastructure.
> It looks like that if there is any trivial/minimal fix it
> is based on your patch suppressing try_to_free_buffers.  Ugh.
> 
> Eric

Ok. What do you think about having my patch for 2.6.23 stable, for 2.6.24
and doing a nicer fix (rd rewrite for example for post 2.6.24)?

Christian
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • [PATCH] rd: Use a private inode for backing storage
    • From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)
  • Re: [PATCH] rd: Mark ramdisk buffers heads dirty
    • From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)

• References:
  • [PATCH resend] ramdisk: fix zeroed ramdisk pages on memory pressure
    • From: Christian Borntraeger <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] rd: Mark ramdisk buffers heads dirty
    • From: Christian Borntraeger <[email protected]>
  • Re: [PATCH] rd: Mark ramdisk buffers heads dirty
    • From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)

• Prev by Date: Re: [Patch](memory hotplug) Make kmem_cache_node for SLUB on memory online to avoid panic(take 3)
• Next by Date: Re: [bug] ata subsystem related crash with latest -git
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH] rd: Mark ramdisk buffers heads dirty
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] rd: Mark ramdisk buffers heads dirty
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]