Re: [PATCH] rd: Mark ramdisk buffers heads dirty

Am Mittwoch, 17. Oktober 2007 schrieb Eric W. Biederman:
> Did you have both of my changes applied?
> To init_page_buffer() and to the ramdisk_set_dirty_page?

Yes, I removed my patch and applied both patches from you. 

Christian
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [PATCH] rd: Mark ramdisk buffers heads dirty
  - From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)

References:
- [PATCH resend] ramdisk: fix zeroed ramdisk pages on memory pressure
  - From: Christian Borntraeger <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] rd: Mark ramdisk buffers heads dirty
  - From: Christian Borntraeger <[email protected]>
- Re: [PATCH] rd: Mark ramdisk buffers heads dirty
  - From: [email protected] (Eric W. Biederman)

Prev by Date: Boot failure with 2.6.23-git12
Next by Date: [PATCH][try 5] architectural pstate driver for powernow-k8
Previous by thread: Re: [RFC][PATCH] block: Isolate the buffer cache in it's own mappings.
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH] rd: Mark ramdisk buffers heads dirty
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Kernel Newbies] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Photo] [Stuff] [Gimp] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Video 4 Linux] [Linux for the blind] [Linux Resources]