Matthew Wilcox wrote:
On Tue, Oct 16, 2007 at 09:54:08PM -0400, Mark Lord wrote:
- t_slot->hpc_ops->get_adapter_status(t_slot, &value); /* Check if slot is occupied */
+ /* Check if slot is occupied */
+ t_slot->hpc_ops->get_adapter_status(t_slot, &value);
if ((POWER_CTRL(ctrl->ctrlcap)) && !value) {
- rc = t_slot->hpc_ops->power_off_slot(t_slot); /* Power off slot if not occupied*/
+ /* Power off slot if not occupied*/
+ rc = t_slot->hpc_ops->power_off_slot(t_slot);
I'd argue these comments fall under "stating the bleedin' obvious", but
that's Kristen's call.
Hey, they're original to the file. I'm just keeping checkpatch.pl happy here.
Ditto for everything else you commented on.
case INT_PRESENCE_OFF:
if (!HP_SUPR_RM(ctrl->ctrlcap))
break;
- dbg("Surprise Removal\n");
+ dbg("Surprise Event\n");
update_slot_info(p_slot);
handle_surprise_event(p_slot);
break;
That doesn't seem like an obviously correct change to me. Can you
explain?
Yeah. You clipped the top line: case INT_PRESENCE_ON:
So that code can be run for both hot plug and hot remove operations.
..
- temp_word = (temp_word & ~intr_enable) | intr_enable;
+ temp_word = (temp_word & ~intr_enable) | intr_enable;
*boggle*
Dig out your text editor, and notice the excess whitespace at the end of the line,
along with similar stuff on most other lines in this patch.
This is all just stuff that checkpatch.pl complains about when
the later patches are applied, so patch 01_... serves to reduce
the noise level from checkpatch.pl for the *real* patches which follow.
-ml
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]
