Re: [PATCH] aic94xx: Use request_firmware() to provide SAS address if the adapter lacks one

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



James Smart wrote:
So, what's the decision - are we only allowing this for physical adapters
that don't have a name ? or are we allowing it to be more dynamic ?

At a minimum, I think(?) we all agree that current upstream aic94xx behavior is nice: allow the admin to override the WWN manually, even if the adapter already has one.

As to the question of request_firmware() versus sysfs, it's IMO largely a question of taste -- do you like the "get property" on-demand pull model, or a push model that presumes the property must be set before it is needed? And which solution requires the least amount of additional userspace machinery in order to be usable?

	Jeff


-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]
  Powered by Linux