Why do you prefer request_firmware() vs something over sysfs ?
Does environments like the kdump kernel also have access to data needed
by request_firmware() ?
-- james s
Andrew Vasquez wrote:
On Mon, 08 Oct 2007, Darrick J. Wong wrote:
On Mon, Oct 08, 2007 at 03:48:32PM -0700, Andrew Vasquez wrote:
So how about factoring that out to a transport-level interface. How
about something along the lines of the following patch, whereby the
software driver upon detecting no valid WWPN, makes an upcall to each
interface's 'request_wwn()'. The data passed in from shost_gendev
should be enough for some helper script to cull relevent device bits
and perhaps offer some level of persistence... Off base?
Hrm... jejb made a remark that it might be better to pass the
scsi_host's device into request_firmware() as your example does, so I'll
pitch in a patch to do likewise with libsas--the scsi_host knows the
actual device it's coming from, and userland can sort that all out later
anyway via DEVPATH.
I suppose one could also have multiple scsi_hosts per PCI device, which
means that my first patch would stumble horribly in more than a few
cases.
This is done already in the FC case -- NPIV. Though with that
interface, the administrator is already responsible for assigning
proper WWNN/WWPN during creation.
Darrick, forgive the FC example, I don't do SAS...
That's ok, I don't do FC. :) Looks mostly good to me...
--
av
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
[Index of Archives]
[Kernel Newbies]
[Netfilter]
[Bugtraq]
[Photo]
[Stuff]
[Gimp]
[Yosemite News]
[MIPS Linux]
[ARM Linux]
[Linux Security]
[Linux RAID]
[Video 4 Linux]
[Linux for the blind]
[Linux Resources]