Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]> writes: >> There is no such thing as bit-order. The data lines are numbered, >> say, D0 - D31, with D0 being LSB (bit) and D31 MSB. >> > > Uh-huh. Check out an IBM Power manual some time. Some pointer maybe? -- Krzysztof Halasa - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in the body of a message to [email protected] More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
- From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
- Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
- References:
- __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
- From: Timur Tabi <[email protected]>
- Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
- From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
- Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
- From: Timur Tabi <[email protected]>
- Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
- From: Anton Altaparmakov <[email protected]>
- Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
- From: Timur Tabi <[email protected]>
- Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
- From: [email protected] (Lennart Sorensen)
- Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
- From: Timur Tabi <[email protected]>
- Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
- From: Krzysztof Halasa <[email protected]>
- Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
- From: Jeremy Fitzhardinge <[email protected]>
- __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
- Prev by Date: Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
- Next by Date: Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
- Previous by thread: Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
- Next by thread: Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
- Index(es):
 |