Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD

Krzysztof Halasa wrote:
> There is no such thing as bit-order. The data lines are numbered,
> say, D0 - D31, with D0 being LSB (bit) and D31 MSB.
>   

Uh-huh.  Check out an IBM Power manual some time.

    J
-
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
the body of a message to [email protected]
More majordomo info at  http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
Please read the FAQ at  http://www.tux.org/lkml/

---

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
    • From: Krzysztof Halasa <[email protected]>

• References:
  • __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
    • From: Timur Tabi <[email protected]>
  • Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
    • From: Jan Engelhardt <[email protected]>
  • Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
    • From: Timur Tabi <[email protected]>
  • Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
    • From: Anton Altaparmakov <[email protected]>
  • Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
    • From: Timur Tabi <[email protected]>
  • Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
    • From: [email protected] (Lennart Sorensen)
  • Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
    • From: Timur Tabi <[email protected]>
  • Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
    • From: Krzysztof Halasa <[email protected]>

• Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH -mm] slub: fix cpu hotplug offline/online path
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH -mm] slub: fix cpu hotplug offline/online path
• Previous by thread: Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
• Next by thread: Re: __LITTLE_ENDIAN vs. __LITTLE_ENDIAN_BITFIELD
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

[Index of Archives]     [Kernel Newbies]     [Netfilter]     [Bugtraq]     [Photo]     [Stuff]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]     [MIPS Linux]     [ARM Linux]     [Linux Security]     [Linux RAID]     [Video 4 Linux]     [Linux for the blind]     [Linux Resources]